This
past weekend, I happened to be watching TV at my uncle’s house with my
five-year-old cousin. Due to my sudden interest in starting this blog about the
media and portrayal of food in advertisements, I decided to pay extra close
attention to the commercials. Gavin, my five year-old-cousin, was watching
SpongeBob SquarePants on Nickelodeon, so I figured there I would come across
perfect examples of an unhealthy food commercial.
Sure
enough, the second commercial that played was a Lucky Charms cereal commercial,
featuring the classic Leprechaun. This advertisement was long, but definitely
caught my attention. The eyes on each character were large and captivating.
There were so many colors presented throughout the ad and each object portrayed
had a glistening glow and sparkle for the magical effect. This cartoon made me
feel like a kid again and introduced an element of fun, which was appropriate given
the channel and show I was watching with my cousin.
This
show triggered an intense craving for the cereal and enlightened me of my past
obsession for Lucky Charms when I was a child. However, I am now educated and
smart enough to acknowledge the lack of nutrients within this sugary meal. I am
not sure why my parents never discouraged me from eating Lucky Charms; perhaps
they were fooled with the nutrient label on the front of the packaging or the
fun and playful commercial that shows on nearly every children’s channel. My
cousin even got sucked into the magical essence of the commercial and told me
how he wished he could be eating that cereal right then. I asked him why he
would choose Lucky Charms when he could have an assortment of fruit; he
responded with, “I don’t care because it is magic!” This is when I was sure
other children would respond with a similar answer because they simply do not
know better than to think their meals are magical. It amazes me to first
handedly notice the effect that an ad such as Lucky Charms can have on a young
individual such as my cousin.
When
I returned back to my dorm room the next day and had free time to explore other
opinions on commercials, I came across an article on Santa Clara University’s
One Search about Nickelodeon’s junk food ads. I figured this was very
appropriate considering my recent experience at my uncle’s house. This article,
“Nickelodeon Markets Nutrition Poor Foods to Children” from the American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
shows a study that was completed on Nickelodeon’s ads; they found that eighty
eight percent of the ads that Nickelodeon shows are considered unhealthy. One
of the most interesting facts about Nickelodeon, that the article mentioned, is
it is the most frequently watched children’s television station and “has great potential
to influence the diets of millions of American children”(48). I could not agree
more with that last statement. It is unfortunate that the obesity problems in
America are extremely prevalent, yet Nickelodeon does little to fight against
poor eating choices.
This
article has two authors: Ameena Batada and Margo G. Wootan. I was able to
locate information regarding Batada and Wootan’s backgrounds in the article’s
“about the author page.” Batada has her doctorate and masters in Public Health;
she currently works at the University of North Carolina. On the other hand, Wootan attended
Cornell and Harvard University to earn her B.S and doctorate in nutrition. They
are both extremely interested in not only nutrition itself, but also the
affects that the media has on our health and choices in life. According to the
“about the author page” that is found through the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, “Wootan has
testified before Congress and state legislatures and been invited to speak by
federal and state agencies including at the National Nutrition Summit, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, the National Academies' Institute of Medicine, and
the Surgeon General's Listening Session for the National Action Plan on
Overweight and Obesity.” Together they published “Nickelodeon Markets Nutrition
Poor Foods to Children” which was originally published in 2007. The American Journal of Preventive Medicine
publishes about current issues, interests, or concerns- especially in the field
of public health. Found in the “about this journal” section, “Papers also address
educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals
to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services.”
Therefore, the article makes it apparent that they are mainly appealing to the
professional level and individuals with a sufficient amount of knowledge in
health.
The
major claim that the authors make in this journal is that companies, such as
Nickelodeon, are promoting foods that are unhealthy eating choices. They
established their credibility through various statistics. One shocking finding
was that out of the twenty one food advertisements found in a Nickelodeon
magazine, seventy six percent of the ads were marketing foods with little to no
nutritional value (49). In turn, the authors hope that pediatricians and
parents will encourage the discontinued usage of junk food marketing to
children. “Nickelodeon should establish nutrition standards and apply them to
the foods that it allows to be advertised on its television station and in its
magazine, as well as for food products and restaurant meals for which it allows
the use of its characters”(50).
In
conclusion, I admire the two authors of this article because they are extremely
credible and present interesting information on Nickelodeon and their unhealthy
marketing approach. I am absolutely convinced that Nickelodeon is unethical and
making the wrong decision with their advertising; in relation, other companies
are using similar tactics. In my future blog posts, I will be comparing and
contrasting two different food advertisements in order to demonstrate how I
believe food companies should properly advertise their products.
Works
Cited
Batada, Ameena, and Margo G. Wootan.
"Nickelodeon Markets Nutrition-Poor Foods to
Children."
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 33.1 (2007): 48-50. Web. 15 Apr.
2014.
Claire, your blog and presentation was very appealing to me! I talked about advertisements and its role on America too. I believe that majority of times that consumers are to blame due to their will power; however, I did believe that children fall under a separate category. I believe that since due to their age they struggle with what is good and bad for you. Most adults though should understand what is good or bad. Advertisers have the right to advertise. They would be stupid not too. But yes, I believe some advertisements are are bad, those just have t be the ones directed a less intelligent audience, like kids. Bottom line though, I do agree with your views and really enjoy your blog!
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you about how Nickelodeon's marketing is immoral. Because their network is entirely geared towards children, they shouldn't be promoting such unhealthy products. It's a completely different story with other franchises that don't specifically target children. Adults have enough experience in life to understand what they should and shouldn't be eating, but children are extremely impressionable. What would your stance on censorship of such advertisements be? Wouldn't that be immoral too in American society?
ReplyDelete